Arbitrator Williamson Says Relevant Surveillance Evidence is Admissible… Period

5 Jul

On May 30th, Ontario labour arbitrator David Williamson issued a preliminary award in which he held that video surveillance footage taken of employees while on duty and in public places was admissible without proof that the surveillance initiative was reasonable. Although Arbitrator Williamson’s finding rests on some employer-favorable facts, he also makes some principled statements in favor of admitting relevant evidence.

See here for snapshot of the positions taken by Ontario arbitrators, a resource I will update in time.

Windsor-Essex County Health Unit v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 543.3 (Kavanaugh Grievance), [2011] O.L.A.A. No. 255 (Williamson).

Advertisements

One Response to “Arbitrator Williamson Says Relevant Surveillance Evidence is Admissible… Period”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Another Ontario Video Surveillance Case. So what!? « All About Information - July 30, 2011

    […] been following this issue (see here and here, most recently), but am wondering the point. I find the split in the arbitral jurisprudence […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: