Three (literal) highlights from the IPC Ontario submission
If Ontario follows through with its commitment to enact privacy legislation, the IPC/Ontario will break from her current constraints to become a privacy regulator with global relevance. We ought to listen carefully to what she is saying about reform and build a strong sense as to how she is inclined.
On October 16th, Commissioner Kosseim filed her submission to the province. It is detailed, thoughtful and strikingly moderate. It has no talk of the concept of “fundamental human rights” that has drawn the attention of the federal commissioner. Rather, the Commissioner says that balancing privacy rights with legitimate business needs is a “virtue.”
Read the submission yourself, but here are the three parts of it that I highlighted in my own read.
First, the Commissioner says we need to reframe the role of consent and develop more principled exceptions, but consent should still be at the top of the hierarchy of the bases for processing:
Second, the Commissioner is clearly interested in AI and its implications and clearly sees value in fostering data-driven innovation, though does not propose any solutions, calling the handling of data-driven innovation “the most challenging piece to get right in any new private sector privacy law.” Here’s my highlight on this issue:
Finally, nobody should underestimate the significance of the potential for Ontario employers to become regulated in respect of their employees. On this issue, the Commissioner’s position is clear: